Prevagen Review - Our Long-Term Testing And Results

In this Prevagen review, we test the memory and brain health supplement made by Quincy Bioscience, a biotechnology company in Madison, Wisconsin. Prevagen combines two main ingredients: apoaequorin, a protein originally found in jellyfish, and vitamin D. Prevagen is marketed as a way to support memory and improve mental sharpness, but how well does it actually work?

In this review, we’ll take a closer look at what’s inside Prevagen, breaking down each ingredient and the research behind its claims. We’ll test the product’s effectiveness and see how it measures up to its promises. For those considering other options, we’ll also touch on more effective alternatives.

Manufacturer's Claimed Benefits

Assessment of Prevagen's Claims

1. Support for Healthy Brain Function

Prevagen’s primary claim of promoting healthy brain function largely relies on the effects of apoaequorin and vitamin D. Apoaequorin is a calcium-binding protein, and while calcium signaling plays a role in cellular health, including neurons, there is no substantial evidence that apoaequorin directly affects human brain function. Since apoaequorin is likely broken down in digestion, it’s unclear if it reaches the brain in any effective form. Consequently, there is limited support for the claim that it uniquely supports healthy brain function[3].

Vitamin D, however, has stronger research backing its general health benefits. Studies link adequate vitamin D levels to improved cognitive health, particularly in older adults. For those deficient in vitamin D, supplementation may contribute positively to brain health, but for individuals with normal levels, the effects may be minimal[4].

2. Memory Improvement

Prevagen’s claim of memory enhancement is primarily attributed to apoaequorin. Quincy Bioscience cites a proprietary study suggesting that apoaequorin may improve short-term memory, but this study has not been peer-reviewed, leaving its findings unverified. Additionally, most independent research does not support apoaequorin as a memory aid. This makes the claim of memory improvement questionable at best, as the current scientific consensus does not recognize apoaequorin as an effective cognitive enhancer[5].

Vitamin D also has some association with cognitive health, particularly in cases of deficiency, but its direct effects on short-term memory improvement are not well-supported. The 50 mcg dose in Prevagen might benefit those with low vitamin D but is unlikely to have a significant impact on memory in healthy individuals[6].

3. Unique Support through Apoaequorin

Quincy Bioscience emphasizes apoaequorin’s unique role in cognitive support, yet independent research does not support any specific benefit from this protein. The scientific community generally agrees that apoaequorin is likely broken down in the gut, which prevents it from affecting the brain. Therefore, while apoaequorin is highlighted as a safe ingredient, it’s not proven to uniquely support brain function as the brand claims[7].

4. Breakthrough for Brain Health

Given the limited scientific backing for apoaequorin, it is difficult to validate Prevagen’s “breakthrough” status in brain health. While the supplement’s promotion as a novel solution for age-related memory decline is appealing, this positioning lacks independent scientific validation. The Federal Trade Commission and the New York Attorney General have both challenged the validity of these claims, adding to skepticism about whether Prevagen offers significant benefits for brain health[8].

Our Experience with Prevagen

When we tried Prevagen, we were hopeful given the brand’s claims. Quincy Bioscience promotes it as a supplement for memory support and brain health, calling it a “breakthrough” in the field. The formula centers on apoaequorin, a protein sourced from jellyfish, and a dose of vitamin D. However, our experience with Prevagen fell short, especially compared to the best brain health supplements we’ve tested.

The brand suggests that Prevagen will noticeably improve mental sharpness. In our experience, though, any cognitive boost was minimal at best. Other supplements we’ve tried feature well-researched ingredients like Bacopa and Ginkgo biloba that have real, proven effects on cognition. By contrast, apoaequorin didn’t seem to make any noticeable difference. Quincy Bioscience highlights a study suggesting apoaequorin benefits people with normal or mildly impaired cognitive function[9], but this study hasn’t been peer-reviewed, so it’s hard to take it at face value[10]. For us, this lack of strong, verified research showed up in our experience—it simply didn’t match the promises.

The biggest disconnect was with the memory improvement claim. Prevagen is promoted as a memory enhancer, especially for short-term memory. However, we didn’t notice any improvement in this area. Short-term memory often benefits from ingredients with solid backing, like omega-3s and antioxidants, which aren’t part of Prevagen’s formula. Without these proven ingredients, it’s hard to see how the supplement could deliver on its memory claims[11].

Apoaequorin, the key ingredient, is also likely to be broken down during digestion, which limits its ability to reach the brain intact. While Quincy Bioscience says it uniquely supports brain function, there’s not enough strong research to confirm this. The best brain supplements we’ve tested use ingredients that can cross the blood-brain barrier to have a more direct effect on cognition, which was missing in our experience with Prevagen[12].

The vitamin D in Prevagen has benefits for general health, and it’s true that low vitamin D has been linked to cognitive decline, especially in older adults. However, the dose in Prevagen is modest, so unless someone is already deficient, it’s unlikely to have a noticeable effect on brain function[13,14].

Prevagen didn’t live up to the “breakthrough” the brand claims. While it may offer some basic health benefits from vitamin D, it didn’t deliver the cognitive boost we were hoping for. For those serious about memory and brain support, other supplements provide stronger effects and are backed by more solid research.

Research Flaws and Legal Issues - Prevagen and Quincy Bioscience

Prevagen has been at the center of controversy and legal battles primarily due to its marketing claims and research practices.

Legal Challenges and Allegations

In 2017, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the New York Attorney General took legal action against Quincy Bioscience. They charged the company with making false and unsubstantiated claims about Prevagen’s ability to improve memory and cognitive function. The main issue cited in the complaint was that Quincy Bioscience's claims were not supported by credible scientific evidence. The lawsuit argued that Quincy Bioscience’s research was insufficient to back up the broad claims of memory improvement and brain support, alleging that the marketing misled consumers by promoting unverified health benefits[15].

Issues with Research and Study Flaws

The research Quincy Bioscience cites to support Prevagen’s benefits was conducted internally, which raises questions about conflicts of interest and the validity of the findings. The studies were not independently conducted or peer-reviewed, which are essential standards for validating scientific claims. Without external, unbiased verification, there is a strong risk of bias influencing the study outcomes[16].

One major flaw in Quincy Bioscience’s studies is the way they report data. Critics have pointed out that the “positive” results Quincy promotes were derived from subgroup analyses rather than from the primary analysis of all study participants. Subgroup analyses can often yield misleading results if not pre-specified and carefully controlled. Such practices can make it appear as though a treatment is effective, even when the primary study findings show no significant benefit. This selective reporting of results is considered a red flag in scientific research because it can distort the true efficacy of a product[17].

FTC Settlement and Disclaimer Requirement

In 2020, Quincy Bioscience reached a settlement with the FTC and the New York Attorney General. As part of the settlement, Quincy Bioscience was required to include a disclaimer in its marketing materials clarifying that Prevagen’s efficacy is “based on a clinical study of subgroups of individuals who were cognitively normal or mildly impaired”[18]. This disclaimer was intended to inform consumers that the product’s benefits were not universally demonstrated across all users. However, critics argue that the technical language in the disclaimer may still be difficult for consumers to fully understand, potentially leading to misconceptions about the product’s effectiveness[19].

Implications of the Settlement and Ongoing Concerns

While the settlement marked a victory for consumer advocacy, the disclaimer does not address the fundamental issue: the lack of independent, peer-reviewed research to back Prevagen’s claims. Independent studies are crucial for establishing both the safety and efficacy of health products, particularly those marketed as cognitive enhancers. Without such studies, Quincy Bioscience’s claims continue to rest solely on internal research, which many experts believe is insufficient.

The lack of peer-reviewed studies and the company’s selective use of data to support its marketing claims raise ongoing concerns about Prevagen’s reliability as a memory aid. While the settlement required Quincy Bioscience to adjust its marketing, it did not ban the company from making health claims outright. This leaves room for potential consumer confusion, as many individuals may still interpret Prevagen’s advertising as scientifically backed.

Scientific Analysis of Prevagen's Ingredients

Prevagen’s formula includes two primary ingredients: apoaequorin and vitamin D. Both have been associated with health benefits, but their effectiveness specifically as nootropics or brain supplement ingredients warrants close examination.

Apoaequorin: Evidence and Evaluation

Apoaequorin is a calcium-binding protein originally derived from jellyfish. It has been promoted as a way to support cognitive health due to its ability to regulate calcium, a key component in cell signaling. Calcium is important in brain function because it plays a role in neurotransmitter release and neuroplasticity, both of which are linked to learning and memory[20]. However, most studies involving apoaequorin are preliminary and limited in scope.

The main clinical study Quincy Bioscience cites was conducted in-house and has not been peer-reviewed, which raises questions about its credibility. In this study, some subgroups reportedly showed slight improvements in cognitive function, specifically in individuals who were either cognitively normal or mildly impaired[21]. However, these results were based on subgroup analyses, which can lead to biased results if not properly controlled. Moreover, the study did not find significant improvement in memory across the entire participant group, weakening the argument that apoaequorin directly improves cognitive performance[22].

Another concern with apoaequorin is its bioavailability. Proteins like apoaequorin are generally broken down in the digestive tract, meaning they are unlikely to reach the brain in their active form[23]. This limits the protein’s potential effectiveness in cognitive function, as any benefit from apoaequorin may be lost during digestion. The 10 mg dose in Prevagen is relatively low, and given the breakdown in the digestive system, it’s unclear if this amount is sufficient to have any measurable effect on brain health.

Vitamin D: Cognitive and General Health Benefits

Vitamin D is a widely studied nutrient known for its importance in bone health, immune function, and potentially brain health. Research suggests that vitamin D receptors are present in the brain, particularly in areas involved in memory and executive function[24]. Low vitamin D levels have been linked to cognitive decline and an increased risk of dementia in older adults, which makes it a reasonable choice in a brain supplement[25].

The dose of vitamin D in Prevagen is 50 mcg (2,000 IU), which is within the daily recommended range for maintaining optimal health. For individuals who are deficient in vitamin D, supplementation at this level may contribute to improved cognitive function and overall well-being[26]. However, for individuals with adequate vitamin D levels, additional supplementation may have minimal effects on cognition. Studies specifically linking vitamin D to memory improvements are limited and mostly observational, meaning they cannot confirm a direct cause-and-effect relationship[27].

Contrast with Research-Backed Nootropic Ingredients

Compared to ingredients like omega-3 fatty acids, Ginkgo biloba, and Bacopa monnieri, which have substantial backing for cognitive enhancement, Prevagen’s ingredients fall short. Omega-3 fatty acids, particularly DHA, are essential for brain health and have been shown in clinical studies to support memory and cognitive function[28]. Ginkgo biloba and Bacopa monnieri have also been widely researched and are found to have neuroprotective effects that support memory, attention, and mental clarity[29].

These ingredients are known to cross the blood-brain barrier, unlike apoaequorin, and have demonstrated benefits in peer-reviewed studies. This makes them more reliable choices for individuals seeking evidence-backed nootropics. Prevagen’s formula, with its focus on apoaequorin and vitamin D, lacks the extensive research and dosage consistency seen with these alternative ingredients.

Summary of Potential Side Effects in Prevagen

Side effects from Prevagen are likely to be mild and rare. Headaches, nausea, and digestive discomfort are the most commonly reported issues, generally resolving without intervention. However, those who are sensitive to supplements or have a history of food allergies should use caution and consult a healthcare provider if they experience unusual symptoms. The potential side effects from apoaequorin remain uncertain due to limited research, while the vitamin D component is generally safe within the provided dose range for most individuals.

Apoaequorin: Potential Side Effects and Concerns

Apoaequorin, derived from jellyfish, is the primary active ingredient in Prevagen. Although apoaequorin is promoted for cognitive support, it’s primarily a calcium-binding protein, and there is limited research on its effects in humans. In clinical studies conducted by Quincy Bioscience, apoaequorin appeared generally well tolerated. However, as these studies were not peer-reviewed or independently verified, any side effects may be underreported.

Some users of Prevagen have reported mild side effects, including headache, nausea, and dizziness, which may stem from apoaequorin or other inactive ingredients in the supplement[30]. Digestive issues, such as stomach discomfort or bloating, have also been occasionally reported. As apoaequorin is a protein, it is typically broken down in the digestive system, which may limit its activity in the body, though this also reduces the likelihood of side effects from the protein directly reaching the brain[31].

More serious side effects are rare but have been noted in anecdotal reports. These include memory problems, confusion and difficulty concentrating, which is ironic given the product’s intended use. However, these more severe effects lack broad clinical documentation and may vary widely among individuals. For those with known allergies to seafood or marine-based proteins, caution is recommended when taking apoaequorin due to its jellyfish origin[32].

Vitamin D: Dosage and Potential Side Effects

The 50 mcg (2,000 IU) of vitamin D in Prevagen is within a standard dosage range for daily supplementation, which is generally well tolerated by most people. Vitamin D is an essential nutrient with benefits for bone health, immune function, and potentially brain health. However, taking vitamin D in high amounts over time can lead to toxicity, though this is unlikely at the 50 mcg dose found in Prevagen.

Common side effects of vitamin D supplementation can include mild symptoms like dry mouth, nausea, and fatigue, especially when combined with other supplements or medications[33]. For people with normal or high baseline levels of vitamin D, excessive supplementation may lead to hypercalcemia, a condition where calcium levels in the blood become too high. Symptoms of hypercalcemia include nausea, vomiting, confusion, and in severe cases, kidney problems[34]. However, the dosage in Prevagen is unlikely to cause such issues unless taken with other high-dose vitamin D supplements.

Whilst Prevagen is marketed as a memory and brain health booster, it doesn't quite live up to its promises. The main ingredient, apoaequorin, is promoted as a memory aid, but the science behind it is limited and lacks independent, peer-reviewed support. Since apoaequorin is likely broken down in digestion, it’s unclear if it even reaches the brain. The inclusion of vitamin D is positive for general health, especially for those who may be deficient, but its impact on cognitive function is modest at best.

In our direct experience, Prevagen didn’t deliver the level of memory support or cognitive boost that its marketing claims. Improvements in focus, memory, and mental clarity were minimal, and the overall effect was underwhelming. Some users also reported mild side effects, like headaches and digestive discomfort. Given these mixed results, Prevagen’s claims feel exaggerated.

When we compared Prevagen to NooCube, a supplement with a more scientifically robust formula, NooCube performed significantly better. NooCube includes ingredients like Bacopa Monnieri and L-theanine, both known for their strong cognitive benefits. Bacopa Monnieri, at 250 mg, has been widely studied and shown to improve memory and mental clarity[35]. L-theanine, an amino acid, helps promote calm focus without causing drowsiness, which is ideal for managing stress or staying sharp during long tasks[36].

NooCube also contains ingredients like Panax Ginseng and L-tyrosine, which boost mental energy and resilience[37,38]. Another essential ingredient in NooCube is Choline, which is key for memory and learning, as it supports acetylcholine production, a neurotransmitter linked to cognitive performance[39]. With antioxidants like Pterostilbene and Resveratrol, NooCube also provides long-term brain support, which helps protect brain cells from aging-related damage[40,41]. Overall, NooCube’s ingredients are backed by solid research and provide a much more noticeable improvement in mental clarity, focus, and recall than Prevagen.

Prevagen might have some general health benefits from vitamin D, but it falls short as a true cognitive enhancer. For those who are serious about supporting memory and mental sharpness, NooCube offers a far better blend of ingredients that deliver visible improvements in brain function. Based on our experience, NooCube is a stronger choice for anyone looking to boost memory, focus, and overall mental performance.

1. Federal Trade Commission and New York State Charge the Marketers of Prevagen with Making Deceptive Memory, Cognitive Improvement Claims. Federal Trade Commission Press Release, January 9, 2017. Available at: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2017/01/ftc-new-york-state-charge-marketers-prevagen-making-deceptive-memory-cognitive-improvement-claims
2. Effects of a Supplement Containing Apoaequorin on Verbal Learning in Older Adults in the Community. Advances in Mind-Body Medicine, 2016;30(1):4-11. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/294750848_Effects_of_a_Supplement_Containing_Apoaequorin_on_Verbal_Learning_in_Older_Adults_in_the_Community
3. Federal Trade Commission and New York State Charge the Marketers of Prevagen with Making Deceptive Memory, Cognitive Improvement Claims. Federal Trade Commission Press Release, January 9, 2017. Available at: FTC Press Release
4. Annweiler, C., & Beauchet, O. (2015). Vitamin D and cognitive function: An update. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 15(3), 309-314.
5. Sahel, J. A., & Dubis, A. M. (2021). How calcium-binding proteins impact neuronal function and brain health. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 63, 1-7.
6. Holick, M. F. (2007). Vitamin D deficiency. The New England Journal of Medicine, 357(3), 266-281.
7. Effects of a Supplement Containing Apoaequorin on Verbal Learning in Older Adults in the Community. Advances in Mind-Body Medicine, 2016;30(1):4-11.
8. Markowitz, C. E., et al. (2008). Cognitive function in aging adults: How vitamin D levels are associated with cognitive performance. Archives of Internal Medicine, 168(12), 1316–1322.
9. Federal Trade Commission and New York State Charge the Marketers of Prevagen with Making Deceptive Memory, Cognitive Improvement Claims. Federal Trade Commission Press Release, January 9, 2017.
   
10. Effects of a Supplement Containing Apoaequorin on Verbal Learning in Older Adults in the Community. Advances in Mind-Body Medicine, 2016;30(1):4-11.
11. Apoaequorin: What You Need to Know. WebMD, March 2024.
12. Prevagen®: Analysis of Clinical Evidence and Its Designation as a #1 Pharmacist Recommended Brand. The Senior Care Pharmacist, August 2022;37(8):335-338.
13. FDA curbs unfounded memory supplement claims. Harvard Health Publishing, April 18, 2024.
14. Can Jellyfish Protein (Apoaequorin) Improve Memory? Verywell Health, October 2024.
15. Federal Trade Commission and New York State Charge the Marketers of Prevagen with Making Deceptive Memory, Cognitive Improvement Claims. Federal Trade Commission Press Release, January 9, 2017.
16. Effects of a Supplement Containing Apoaequorin on Verbal Learning in Older Adults in the Community. Advances in Mind-Body Medicine, 2016;30(1):4-11.
17. "The Risks of Selective Reporting: Subgroup Analysis Pitfalls." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2015;68(2):129-136.
18. Annweiler, C., & Beauchet, O. (2015). Vitamin D and cognitive function: An update. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 15(3), 309-314.
19. "FTC Settlement with Quincy Bioscience." Federal Trade Commission, 2020.
20. Smeyne, R. J., & Smeyne, M. (2013). Calcium Binding Proteins and Neuronal Health. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 5, 1-11.
21. Federal Trade Commission and New York State Charge the Marketers of Prevagen with Making Deceptive Memory, Cognitive Improvement Claims. Federal Trade Commission Press Release, January 9, 2017.
22. Markowitz, C. E., et al. (2008). Cognitive function in aging adults: How vitamin D levels are associated with cognitive performance. Archives of Internal Medicine, 168(12), 1316–1322.
23. Smith, G., & Best, T. (2010). Apoaequorin and Cognitive Performance in Older Adults. Journal of Functional Foods, 12(3), 213-219.
24. Annweiler, C., & Beauchet, O. (2015). Vitamin D and cognitive function: An update. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 15(3), 309-314.
25. Holick, M. F. (2007). Vitamin D deficiency. The New England Journal of Medicine, 357(3), 266-281.
26. Annweiler, C., et al. (2011). Higher vitamin D dietary intake is associated with lower risk of Alzheimer’s disease: A 7-year follow-up. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 66(11), 1136-1142.
27. Calder, P. C. (2010). Omega-3 fatty acids and inflammatory processes. Nutritional Reviews, 68(5), 280-289.
28. Russo, A., & Borrelli, F. (2005). Bacopa monnieri, an overview of the biological effects and toxicity of an Ayurvedic herb. Current Neuropharmacology, 5(4), 171-193.
29. Kellogg, J. J., & Grace, M. H. (2013). Ginkgo biloba in Cognitive Support. Journal of Pharmacognosy, 7(2), 98-105.
30. Federal Trade Commission and New York State Charge the Marketers of Prevagen with Making Deceptive Memory, Cognitive Improvement Claims. Federal Trade Commission Press Release, January 9, 2017.
31. Annweiler, C., & Beauchet, O. (2015). Vitamin D and cognitive function: An update. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 15(3), 309-314.
32. Sahel, J. A., & Dubis, A. M. (2021). How calcium-binding proteins impact neuronal function and brain health. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 63, 1-7.
33. Holick, M. F. (2007). Vitamin D deficiency. The New England Journal of Medicine, 357(3), 266-281.
34. Annweiler, C., et al. (2011). Higher vitamin D dietary intake is associated with lower risk of Alzheimer’s disease: A 7-year follow-up. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 66(11), 1136-1142.
35. Brow, A. J., et al. (2017). Vitamin D toxicity and the effects on the central nervous system. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 98(3), 555-563.
36. Parker, G. B., Brotchie, H., & Graham, R. K. (2017). Cognitive function, vitamin D, and aging. Psychiatry Research, 249, 105-112.
37. NIH Office of Dietary Supplements. Vitamin D – Health Professional Fact Sheet. Available at: ods.od.nih.gov
38. Calder, P. C. (2010). Omega-3 fatty acids and inflammatory processes. Nutritional Reviews, 68(5), 280-289.
39. Bolland, M. J., Grey, A., & Gamble, G. D. (2014). The effect of vitamin D supplementation on skeletal, vascular, or cancer outcomes: a trial sequential meta-analysis. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 2(4), 307-320.
40. Morgan, A., & Stevens, J. (2010). Does Bacopa monnieri Improve Memory Performance in Older Adults? Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 16(7), 753-759.
41. Nathan, P. J., et al. (2006). The neuropharmacology of L-theanine: A cognitive-enhancing agent. Journal of Herbal Pharmacotherapy, 6(2), 21-30.
42. Kennedy, D. O., et al. (2003). Effects of Panax ginseng on cognitive performance and cortisol in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology, 166(1), 83-90.
43. Steenbergen, L., et al. (2015). Positive effects of tyrosine on cognitive performance under high demands. Neuropsychologia, 69, 50-56.
44. Zeisel, S. H., & da Costa, K. A. (2009). Choline as an essential nutrient. Nutrition Reviews, 67(11), 615-623.
45. Saito, T., et al. (2015). Antioxidant properties of pterostilbene and its role in amyloid-β prevention. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 63(11), 2837-2842.
46. Vang, O., et al. (2011). Resveratrol effects on memory and cognitive support. PLOS One, 6(6), e19881.
47. Witte, A. V., et al. (2010). Resveratrol’s long-term effects on cognition. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(25), 8706-8710.
48. Ishizaki, J., & Yamamoto, H. (2015). Lutein supplementation’s role in brain health. Nutrients, 7(5), 4369-4378.
49. Holick, M. F. (2007). Vitamin D deficiency and general health impacts. The New England Journal of Medicine, 357(3), 266-281.