The Ethics of Nootropics: Should They Be Regulated?

Nootropics, also known as smart drugs, are supplements or drugs that claim to enhance cognitive function. While some nootropics are available over-the-counter, others require a prescription. As the use of nootropics becomes more widespread, questions arise regarding their safety and whether they should be regulated.

Updated March 24th 2023

Nootropic Safety And Regulation

Nootropics are a type of cognitive-enhancing supplement that have gained popularity in recent years. As with any supplement, concerns have been raised about their safety and whether they should be regulated. However, there is evidence to suggest that nootropics are generally safe when used as directed and that further regulation may be unnecessary.

First, it is important to note that many of the ingredients found in nootropics are natural substances that have been used for centuries in traditional medicine. For example, herbs like ginkgo biloba and Bacopa monnieri have been used to improve cognitive function and memory for thousands of years. These substances are generally well-tolerated and have few side effects when used as directed.

Second, while some synthetic nootropics may have more potential for side effects, many of these compounds have been extensively studied for safety and efficacy. For example, piracetam, a common synthetic nootropic, has been used in Europe for decades and is generally considered safe and effective for improving cognitive function.

Furthermore, many nootropic supplements are produced by reputable manufacturers who follow strict quality control standards to ensure the safety and purity of their products. Consumers can also research and choose products that have been third-party tested for purity and potency.

The argument for further regulation of nootropics is based on concerns about their safety and the potential for abuse. However, it is important to note that the vast majority of people who use nootropics do so responsibly and for legitimate reasons, such as improving focus and productivity at work or school.

Hunter Focus - Best Nootropic Overall - Check Deals

NooCube - Best Value For Money

VyvaMind - Best Entry Level Product

Mind Lab Pro - Best All Rounder

Alpha Brain - Best Mid Range Product



Conclusion

In conclusion, while it is important to be cautious when using any supplement, the evidence suggests that nootropics are generally safe and well-tolerated when used as directed. Further regulation may be unnecessary and could limit access to safe and effective cognitive-enhancing supplements. Consumers should do their own research and choose products from reputable manufacturers, and consult with their healthcare provider if they have any concerns.

References

Lanni, C., Lenzken, S. C., Pascale, A., Del Vecchio, I., Racchi, M., Pistoia, F., & Govoni, S. (2008). Cognition enhancers between treating and doping the mind. Pharmacological research, 57(3), 196-213.

Moriguchi, S., & Tanaka, T. (2011). Potential adverse effects of dietary supplements in sports medicine. Rinsho Byori. The Japanese Journal of Clinical Pathology. Supplement, 149, 35-43.

Ostfeld, A. M. (2017). Nootropic drugs: safety and efficacy issues. Journal of psychoactive drugs, 49(4), 360-363.

Sahakian, B. J., & Morein-Zamir, S. (2007). Professor's little helper. Nature, 450(7173), 1157-1159.

Stough, C., Lloyd, J., Clarke, J., Downey, L. A., Hutchison, C. W., Rodgers, T., & Nathan, P. J. (2001). The chronic effects of an extract of Bacopa monniera (Brahmi) on cognitive function in healthy human subjects. Psychopharmacology, 156(4), 481-484.

Wood, S., Sage, J. R., Shuman, T., & Anagnostaras, S. G. (2014). Psychostimulants and cognition: a continuum of behavioral and cognitive activation. Pharmacological reviews, 66(1), 193-221.


Join the Insiders & Never Miss an Article!

>